chat:
posted by Nate Nead on April 22nd, 2009 • 6 Comments

Bluetooth marketing is a proximity specific form of advertising that can be simply and effectively integrated into a digital signage network. Its potential applications for Point-of-Sale and digital signage are virtually limitless. The following post will discuss different methodologies of Bluetooth integration and some best practices dos and don'ts for digital signage vendors.

Any individual with a Bluetooth enabled mobile phone can instantly receive rich content which may include song downloads, short video clips, coupons, web apps, and links to micro-sites. Beneficially Bluetooth allows for specific-area, rich content to be disseminated to mobile devices without the high cost and complex issues had by other forms of mobile marketing. SMS and MMS are excellent ways to distribute advertising to mobile devices, but the cost is often considered astronomical. I read a news piece about a year ago that indicated SMS had a higher message transfer cost than sending messages to and from the Hubble space telescope--four times more expensive in fact. Quite literally, the costs of SMS and MMS are cosmically crippling. In contrast, Bluetooth technology allows for those in close proximity of a transmitter to receive media, both solicited and unsolicited. It is the "push" ability of Bluetooth marketers, along with its inexpensive nature of the ad medium that makes Bluetooth a double-edged sword technology.

An individual who has set their mobile device to "active" or "discoverable" can receive rich media messages from a Bluetooth broadcasting device. There are essentially four methodologies a digital signage marketer would need to consider when applying Bluetooth technology to a digital signage network. I have outlined the methodologies below along with their corresponding effectiveness. 

Method 1: Extreme Close-Range Positive Consumer Interaction 

Close-range positive interaction is the least intrusive form of Bluetooth marketing. An individual wishing to have rich content messages blasted to their mobile must first have the Bluetooth capability "switched-on." Secondly, said person must also wave the handset close to a Bluetooth device. These are usually followed by some sort of call to action and a clear explanation of what to do in order to receive rich content. "It is clear in this scenario that the consumer has chosen to interact by their action." This is key. Advertising without consent from the advertisee can do more harm than good. As digital media continues to become more interactive it also becomes more invasive, which is why protecting user privacy is key--most certainly with a device as personal as someone's cellular phone. The methods that follow just get progressively more "in your face." 

Method 2: Close-Range, Contextual Bluetooth Activation Interaction

In the close-range, contextual blasts rich media via Bluetooth to any phone within the vicinity of a digital signage display. In this case, the blast becomes less like spam because there is at least another form of media pointing the consumer to the same thing. Mobile Marketing's best practices guidelines state: "Although a call to action is less technically necessary because the message is sent on the basis of proximity, it is still very much advisable to include one (e.g. a poster at station asking people to go to the Bluetooth zone) however this ‘in context’ application does reflect the consumer’s likely interest in, and relevance to, an advertiser’s message."

Method 3: Close-Range General Bluetooth Activation Interaction

Simply put, Method 3 could be referred to as a close-rage, out-of-context Bluetooth spam. "This is as [Method 2] but in a general environment in which the message is not necessarily in context.  Arguably this would include a shopping mall but also raises privacy issues for consumers because there is no clear call to action - rather it is based on a general proximity only. Clearly this is subjective – a shopping Mall operator may argue that such an application is in general context however a consumer may argue the opposite and consider this the basis of a grievance." A very stern warning to advertisers is that this method will most likely do more harm than good. Your message will, more often than not, make consumers feel angry and violated--not a feeling you want to have them associate with your brand. 

Method 4: Wide-Range General Bluetooth Activation Interaction

Like Method 3, Method 4 is simply Bluetooth spam that covers a much larger area. From the Mobile Marketing Best Practices Guidelines: "Although messages can be sent to anyone with Bluetooth enabled in that area, it is again still advisable to include a call to action because, without one, this general use runs the risk of being unwelcome to consumers who do not like – and would view these as - unsolicited communications.  This is never advisable – in effect the only ‘action’ that the consumer has taken is to enable their device which, in itself, is not in our opinion a valid call to action.  Whereas in [Method 1] and [Method 2] there is a clear action inviting – or at least potentially justifying – a Bluetooth message, in this case there is not."               

My take is that anything beyond Method 1 is spam. If I walk past a digital display and receive some sort of advertising message on my phone just because it's considered "contextual" without my consent, I would probably not be super happy. In any event, this would be an invasion of privacy--even if it is considered "in context." I'll not even begin to delve into Methods 3 and 4. They are simply "right out." This brings us back around full-circle to idea of a the two-faced marketing medium that is Bluetooth. On the one hand, we have a method of sending out a necessary message. Opposingly, a message sent without "positive interaction" can be obnoxious and detrimental to the messenger who wishes to promulgate their message. The moral of the story: although it may seem inviting to participate in Bluetooth marketing spam, don't. You may find yourself shooting yourself in yourself's foot. 

Related Posts: Digital Signage and Mobile Marketing: A Better Way to Judge Digital Signage ROI

Digital Signage and RFID

del.icio.us Digg Facebook Newsvine reddit StumbleUpon Technorati
posted on April 22nd, 2009 • 6 Comments

esha
Very interesting article. I came accross Futurlink a proximity marketing company from spain with products for bluetooth marketing. i would reccomend a look for readers interested in proximity mobile marketing

Apr 22nd, 2009 3:47 amReplyQuote and ReplyTop


score:
1
nate
Thanks for the heads-up. There certainly is plenty of room for growth in this segment, especially as it relates to DOOH.

Apr 22nd, 2009 7:08 amReplyQuote and ReplyTop


score:
1
dweinfeld
Very strong post. My opinion toward Bluetooth often wavers between the positive and negative ends of the advertising spectrum. The key advantage is no cost wireless transmission of rich content, without needing a specialized application on your phone to do so. You can reach a wide array of consumers and spread the brand conversation to the mobile channel at very little cost. There, however, are key detractors to the Bluetooth as mobile marketing champion story.

Bluetooth is undoubtedly a technology with a number of benefits, but it is also one that can be easily taken advantage of by unscrupulous companies. While Bluetooth offers the hope of a seamless gateway between a brand's content and a user's mobile phone, it can just as easily be leveraged to spam consumers.

Used in the manner that you suggest, Bluetooth could very well have a bright future in the digital out-of-home space. This opportunity is tempered against the chance that Bluetooth could become a major weapon for spammers. The last thing anyone wants is to be walking through a retail center or public area and be pinged by countless advertising offers via Bluetooth. If we can harness the technology's core benefits and enforce stict standards against its misuse, Bluetooth may emerge as a key communication platform for advertisers.


Apr 22nd, 2009 9:33 amReplyQuote and ReplyTop


score:
1
nate
Dave, couldn't have said it better myself. Bluetooth is powerful, but there certainly needs to be some bridling to tame the beast. Otherwise, the potential will be completely lost in consumer annoyance--something we don't want, especially in the infancy of its use.

Apr 22nd, 2009 9:46 amReplyQuote and ReplyTop


score:
1
jasonm
I have to say, as an opposer to spam in general, i'm still on the edge about this. I was at a show (the V festival) Virgin mobile was sending out messages about playlists, performers updates, etc. Even though also advertising their other services, I was only happy to receive it. That being said, I would really hate the situations mentioned above. But how can it be regulated? I was actually looking into using Virgin's provider Qwikker Bluetooth Mobile Marketing but can't quite reconcile how I can effectively use it.

Apr 23rd, 2009 10:30 pmReplyQuote and ReplyTop


score:
1
nate
There is certainly a efficient way to reconcile the issues. The problem may be finding the best way to do so. I think the biggest risk marketers may run into here is a possible "jumping in full force" without looking into the brand repercussions that may be had. In most cases, I think it's best to err on caution's side. In my opinion, this means never venturing far beyond Method 1 mentioned above. But, that's just me.

Apr 24th, 2009 11:26 amReplyQuote and ReplyTop


score:
1
What do you think?




Keep up to date on blog posts
and the Digital Signage Industry

Subscribe via RSS

Translate This Article
Deploid Digital Signage



© 2010 Digital Signage.com LLC. All Rights Reserved.